Nanopublications LDF server

Matches in Nanopublications for { <https://doi.org/10.3233/DS-170010> ?p ?o ?g. }

• DS-170010 type PositionPaper assertion.
• DS-170010 type PositionPaper assertion.
• DS-170010 type PositionPaper assertion.
• DS-170010 type PositionPaper assertion.
• DS-170010 type PositionPaper assertion.
• DS-170010 type PositionPaper assertion.
• DS-170010 title "Genuine semantic publishing" assertion.
• DS-170010 title "Genuine semantic publishing" assertion.
• DS-170010 title "Genuine semantic publishing" assertion.
• DS-170010 title "Genuine semantic publishing" assertion.
• DS-170010 title "Genuine semantic publishing" assertion.
• DS-170010 title "Genuine semantic publishing" assertion.
• DS-170010 date "2017-12-08" assertion.
• DS-170010 date "2017-12-08" assertion.
• DS-170010 date "2017-12-08" assertion.
• DS-170010 date "2017-12-08" assertion.
• DS-170010 date "2017-12-08" assertion.
• DS-170010 date "2017-12-08" assertion.
• DS-170010 abstract "Various approaches and systems have been presented in the context of scholarly communication for what has been called semantic publishing. Closer inspection, however, reveals that these approaches are mostly not about publishing semantic representations, as the name seems to suggest. Rather, they take the processes and outcomes of the current narrative-based publishing system for granted and only work with already published papers. This includes approaches involving semantic annotations, semantic interlinking, semantic integration, and semantic discovery, but with the semantics coming into play only after the publication of the original article. While these are interesting and important approaches, they fall short of providing a vision to transcend the current publishing paradigm. We argue here for taking the term semantic publishing literally and work towards a vision of genuine semantic publishing, where computational tools and algorithms can help us with dealing with the wealth of human knowledge by letting researchers capture their research results with formal semantics from the start, as integral components of their publications. We argue that these semantic components should furthermore cover at least the main claims of the work, that they should originate from the authors themselves, and that they should be fine-grained and light-weight for optimized re-usability and minimized publication overhead. This paper is in fact not just advocating our concept, but is itself a genuine semantic publication, thereby demonstrating and illustrating our points." assertion.
• DS-170010 abstract "Various approaches and systems have been presented in the context of scholarly communication for what has been called semantic publishing. Closer inspection, however, reveals that these approaches are mostly not about publishing semantic representations, as the name seems to suggest. Rather, they take the processes and outcomes of the current narrative-based publishing system for granted and only work with already published papers. This includes approaches involving semantic annotations, semantic interlinking, semantic integration, and semantic discovery, but with the semantics coming into play only after the publication of the original article. While these are interesting and important approaches, they fall short of providing a vision to transcend the current publishing paradigm. We argue here for taking the term semantic publishing literally and work towards a vision of genuine semantic publishing, where computational tools and algorithms can help us with dealing with the wealth of human knowledge by letting researchers capture their research results with formal semantics from the start, as integral components of their publications. We argue that these semantic components should furthermore cover at least the main claims of the work, that they should originate from the authors themselves, and that they should be fine-grained and light-weight for optimized re-usability and minimized publication overhead. This paper is in fact not just advocating our concept, but is itself a genuine semantic publication, thereby demonstrating and illustrating our points." assertion.
• DS-170010 abstract "Various approaches and systems have been presented in the context of scholarly communication for what has been called semantic publishing. Closer inspection, however, reveals that these approaches are mostly not about publishing semantic representations, as the name seems to suggest. Rather, they take the processes and outcomes of the current narrative-based publishing system for granted and only work with already published papers. This includes approaches involving semantic annotations, semantic interlinking, semantic integration, and semantic discovery, but with the semantics coming into play only after the publication of the original article. While these are interesting and important approaches, they fall short of providing a vision to transcend the current publishing paradigm. We argue here for taking the term semantic publishing literally and work towards a vision of genuine semantic publishing, where computational tools and algorithms can help us with dealing with the wealth of human knowledge by letting researchers capture their research results with formal semantics from the start, as integral components of their publications. We argue that these semantic components should furthermore cover at least the main claims of the work, that they should originate from the authors themselves, and that they should be fine-grained and light-weight for optimized re-usability and minimized publication overhead. This paper is in fact not just advocating our concept, but is itself a genuine semantic publication, thereby demonstrating and illustrating our points." assertion.
• DS-170010 abstract "Various approaches and systems have been presented in the context of scholarly communication for what has been called semantic publishing. Closer inspection, however, reveals that these approaches are mostly not about publishing semantic representations, as the name seems to suggest. Rather, they take the processes and outcomes of the current narrative-based publishing system for granted and only work with already published papers. This includes approaches involving semantic annotations, semantic interlinking, semantic integration, and semantic discovery, but with the semantics coming into play only after the publication of the original article. While these are interesting and important approaches, they fall short of providing a vision to transcend the current publishing paradigm. We argue here for taking the term semantic publishing literally and work towards a vision of genuine semantic publishing, where computational tools and algorithms can help us with dealing with the wealth of human knowledge by letting researchers capture their research results with formal semantics from the start, as integral components of their publications. We argue that these semantic components should furthermore cover at least the main claims of the work, that they should originate from the authors themselves, and that they should be fine-grained and light-weight for optimized re-usability and minimized publication overhead. This paper is in fact not just advocating our concept, but is itself a genuine semantic publication, thereby demonstrating and illustrating our points." assertion.
• DS-170010 abstract "Various approaches and systems have been presented in the context of scholarly communication for what has been called semantic publishing. Closer inspection, however, reveals that these approaches are mostly not about publishing semantic representations, as the name seems to suggest. Rather, they take the processes and outcomes of the current narrative-based publishing system for granted and only work with already published papers. This includes approaches involving semantic annotations, semantic interlinking, semantic integration, and semantic discovery, but with the semantics coming into play only after the publication of the original article. While these are interesting and important approaches, they fall short of providing a vision to transcend the current publishing paradigm. We argue here for taking the term semantic publishing literally and work towards a vision of genuine semantic publishing, where computational tools and algorithms can help us with dealing with the wealth of human knowledge by letting researchers capture their research results with formal semantics from the start, as integral components of their publications. We argue that these semantic components should furthermore cover at least the main claims of the work, that they should originate from the authors themselves, and that they should be fine-grained and light-weight for optimized re-usability and minimized publication overhead. This paper is in fact not just advocating our concept, but is itself a genuine semantic publication, thereby demonstrating and illustrating our points." assertion.
• DS-170010 abstract "Various approaches and systems have been presented in the context of scholarly communication for what has been called semantic publishing. Closer inspection, however, reveals that these approaches are mostly not about publishing semantic representations, as the name seems to suggest. Rather, they take the processes and outcomes of the current narrative-based publishing system for granted and only work with already published papers. This includes approaches involving semantic annotations, semantic interlinking, semantic integration, and semantic discovery, but with the semantics coming into play only after the publication of the original article. While these are interesting and important approaches, they fall short of providing a vision to transcend the current publishing paradigm. We argue here for taking the term semantic publishing literally and work towards a vision of genuine semantic publishing, where computational tools and algorithms can help us with dealing with the wealth of human knowledge by letting researchers capture their research results with formal semantics from the start, as integral components of their publications. We argue that these semantic components should furthermore cover at least the main claims of the work, that they should originate from the authors themselves, and that they should be fine-grained and light-weight for optimized re-usability and minimized publication overhead. This paper is in fact not just advocating our concept, but is itself a genuine semantic publication, thereby demonstrating and illustrating our points." assertion.
• DS-170010 isPartOf 2451-8492 assertion.
• DS-170010 isPartOf 2451-8492 assertion.
• DS-170010 isPartOf 2451-8492 assertion.
• DS-170010 isPartOf 2451-8492 assertion.
• DS-170010 isPartOf 2451-8492 assertion.
• DS-170010 isPartOf 2451-8492 assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RANe7gL_xQhoyK-WFbqDc_J78065uEtfP_VUStfedVvD0 assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RANe7gL_xQhoyK-WFbqDc_J78065uEtfP_VUStfedVvD0 assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RANe7gL_xQhoyK-WFbqDc_J78065uEtfP_VUStfedVvD0 assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RANe7gL_xQhoyK-WFbqDc_J78065uEtfP_VUStfedVvD0 assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RANe7gL_xQhoyK-WFbqDc_J78065uEtfP_VUStfedVvD0 assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RANe7gL_xQhoyK-WFbqDc_J78065uEtfP_VUStfedVvD0 assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RA3G3aBhSQ7oXqTqhM82Wi4loFsemUWuWbVAS5TbkXLEU assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RA3G3aBhSQ7oXqTqhM82Wi4loFsemUWuWbVAS5TbkXLEU assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RA3G3aBhSQ7oXqTqhM82Wi4loFsemUWuWbVAS5TbkXLEU assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RA3G3aBhSQ7oXqTqhM82Wi4loFsemUWuWbVAS5TbkXLEU assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RA3G3aBhSQ7oXqTqhM82Wi4loFsemUWuWbVAS5TbkXLEU assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RA3G3aBhSQ7oXqTqhM82Wi4loFsemUWuWbVAS5TbkXLEU assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAOEj7WGlDM-jEbUgkpW9rsZHozIgVe69rGu-DkIv-nAM assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAOEj7WGlDM-jEbUgkpW9rsZHozIgVe69rGu-DkIv-nAM assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAOEj7WGlDM-jEbUgkpW9rsZHozIgVe69rGu-DkIv-nAM assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAOEj7WGlDM-jEbUgkpW9rsZHozIgVe69rGu-DkIv-nAM assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAOEj7WGlDM-jEbUgkpW9rsZHozIgVe69rGu-DkIv-nAM assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAOEj7WGlDM-jEbUgkpW9rsZHozIgVe69rGu-DkIv-nAM assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RApCtlkxBOmaKkQY48EiLAn0BaXfnQo2v0EZ-jIpHUC6Y assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RApCtlkxBOmaKkQY48EiLAn0BaXfnQo2v0EZ-jIpHUC6Y assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RApCtlkxBOmaKkQY48EiLAn0BaXfnQo2v0EZ-jIpHUC6Y assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RApCtlkxBOmaKkQY48EiLAn0BaXfnQo2v0EZ-jIpHUC6Y assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RApCtlkxBOmaKkQY48EiLAn0BaXfnQo2v0EZ-jIpHUC6Y assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RApCtlkxBOmaKkQY48EiLAn0BaXfnQo2v0EZ-jIpHUC6Y assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAPvkZJUbHr6mrRgt1dZAXh_A3N9l-uaglBUc-7wghUKc assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAPvkZJUbHr6mrRgt1dZAXh_A3N9l-uaglBUc-7wghUKc assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAPvkZJUbHr6mrRgt1dZAXh_A3N9l-uaglBUc-7wghUKc assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAPvkZJUbHr6mrRgt1dZAXh_A3N9l-uaglBUc-7wghUKc assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAPvkZJUbHr6mrRgt1dZAXh_A3N9l-uaglBUc-7wghUKc assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAPvkZJUbHr6mrRgt1dZAXh_A3N9l-uaglBUc-7wghUKc assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAYSqqQ5_ZX0HtgTHSfwZbge9nAtqy9QXvhcuRimoWj3Q assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAYSqqQ5_ZX0HtgTHSfwZbge9nAtqy9QXvhcuRimoWj3Q assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAypjyd0XFhaFD1XdZ_IlMniCr-2-RjN9ihfRMUs75TCI assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAnpypxtkVP_E5oivwjj8mE8KFMNXCsm82746wGZPlyk0 assertion.
• DS-170010 hasPart RAnpypxtkVP_E5oivwjj8mE8KFMNXCsm82746wGZPlyk0 assertion.
• DS-170010 critiques Semantic_publishing assertion.
• DS-170010 critiques Semantic_publishing assertion.
• DS-170010 describes GenuineSemanticPublishing assertion.
• DS-170010 describes GenuineSemanticPublishing assertion.
• DS-170010 supports GenuineSemanticPublishing assertion.
• DS-170010 supports GenuineSemanticPublishing assertion.